Dailyreport
CHRICED argues that Abuja should be the 37th state in Nigeria
In a bold political move, the Resource Centre for Human Rights & Civic Education (CHRICED) has called for Abuja to be officially recognized as Nigeria’s 37th state. The advocacy group argues that granting Abuja full statehood will enhance governance, accountability, and representation for residents of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).CHRICED argues that Abuja should be the 37th state in Nigeria
Why CHRICED Wants Abuja to Become a State
According to CHRICED, Abuja’s current status as the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) denies its residents full democratic rights, including:
✅ Electing their own governor and state legislature
✅ Gaining more control over local governance
✅ Receiving fair allocations like other states
The organization insists that FCT residents deserve the same political and economic rights as Nigerians in other states.
Challenges & Reactions
The proposal has sparked mixed reactions across the country. While some support increasing Abuja’s political autonomy, others argue that its status as the nation’s capital should remain unchanged.
🔹 Supporters say statehood will bring more development and fair governance.
🔹 Critics warn it could complicate federal operations in the capital.
What’s Next?
CHRICED is set to intensify advocacy efforts, pushing for constitutional amendments to make Abuja Nigeria’s 37th state. The debate is expected to gain traction in the National Assembly and among political stakeholders.
For the latest updates on this developing story, visit [this external link].
CHRICED argues that Abuja should be the 37th state in Nigeria
Moreover, we believe that any constitutional change pertaining to the composition of Nigeria’s federation should not only recognize Abuja but also greatly reduce the size of the government apparatus and the cost of governance, making it more effective and sensitive to the needs of the populace.
There should be a thorough transfer of authority and funding from the national government to these local organizations in tandem with this change.
We can guarantee more localized governance and better tailor policies and initiatives to the particular needs and circumstances of each region by giving the regions more authority. This would also promote healthy regional competition, which would spur innovation and development and lessen the over-reliance on federal funding.
){kind=link}